Osnova sekce

  • Learning Outcomes

    • Student explains the principles and legal foundation of capital and payment movements.
    • Student interprets Articles 63–66 TFEU in the context of liberalization of capital flows.
    • Student analyzes examples of restrictions and their justifications in national legislation.
    • Student assesses the relationship between free movement of capital and financial regulation.

    Compulsory EU Law

    • TFEU, Articles 63-66, 75, 143-144, 215, 345
    • Case 203/80 Casati
    • Case 286/82 and 26/83 Luisi and Carbone
    • Case C-163/94, C-165/94 and C-250/94 Sanz de Lera
    • Case C-101/05 Skatteverket

    Task to Consider

    Instructions for students (max. 300–400 words total):

    Answer the following four short questions. Support your answers with references to the relevant Treaty provisions and case law.

    • Question 1: Explain the difference between movements of capital and payments under EU law. Refer to Articles 63–66 TFEU and relevant case law.
    • Question 2: Is a system of prior administrative authorisation for transferring money to another Member State compatible with EU law? Refer to Sanz de Lera and Casati.
    • Question 3: Can Member States impose declaration or reporting obligations on cross-border cash payments? Refer to Luisi and Carbone and Skatteverket.
    • Question 4: List two legitimate grounds on which restrictions on the free movement of capital may be justified under EU law.